Determination of the Maximum Permissible Activity of 60Co Line Source for Different Application Modes of Lead Cell

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor. Northwest Research Complex (Bonab), Radiation Applications Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph. D. in Electrical Engineering, Northwest Research Complex (Bonab), Radiation Applications Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Isolation of radiation sources is one of the most important methods of the radiation protection in order to prevent harm to human beings. Usually, lead cells with plumbic brick walls are used for isolation of medium and low radiation level sources. In this research, the maximum permissible activity of 60Co line source was calculated using both the analytical and Monte Carlo methods, such that the handling of this amount of activity inside the lead cell with 5 cm standard plumbic brick walls, could fulfill the accepted international criteria for lead cells application in restricted areas. The difference between the analytical and Monte Carlo results was obtained less than 16% in average. The results showed that, the activity of 60Co source should be less than 5.61 and 48.25 mCi for the analytical method and less than 6.67 and 56.36 mCi for Monte Carlo method respectively at irradiate/storage and load/unload (as well as transient) operation modes. The proposed analytical method could generate MCNPX code data with relatively good approximation.

Keywords


[1] Akkurt I., Akyldrm H., Mavi B., Kilincarslan S., Basyigit C., “Photon attenuation coefficients of concrete include barite in different rate”, Ann. Nucl. Energy 37 (2010) 910–914.
[2] Sharifi S., Bagheri R., Shirmardi S.P., “Comparison of shielding properties for ordinary, barite, serpentine and steel–magnetite concretes using MCNP-4C code and available experimental Results”, Ann. Nucl. Energy 53 (2013) 529–534.
[3] Bootjomchai C., Laopaiboon J., Yenchai C., Laopaiboon R., “Gamma-ray shielding and structural properties of barium–bismuth–borosilicate glasses”, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 81 (2012) 785–790.
[4] Singh V.P., Badiger N.M., “Effective atomic numbers, electron densities, and tissue equivalence of some gases and mixtures for dosimetry of radiation detectors”, Nucl. Technol. Radiat. 27 (2012) 117–124.
[5] Demir F., Budak G., Sahin R., Karabulut A., Oltulu M., Un A., “Determination of radiation attenuation coefficients of heavyweight- and normal-weight concretes containing colemanite and barite for 0.663 MeV c-rays,” Ann. Nucl. Energy 38 (2011) 1274–1278.
[6] Cember H., Johnson T.E., Introduction to Health Physics, (McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2009).
[7] Adeli R., Bagheri R., Shirmardi S.P., “Theory and simulation investigation of low-energy neutron shielding for different boron compounds”, J. Test. Eval. 45 (2017) 1570-1576.
[8] Adeli R., Shirmardi S.P., Ahmadi S.J., Mazinani S., “High energetic gamma attenuating from a neutron field using a lead free reinforced composite”, J. Nucl. Sci. Tehnol. 15 (2016) 22-29 (In Persian).
[9] Shafaei M.A., “Assessment of mass attenuation coefficient of lead nanoparticles for variety of gamma source”, J. Radiat. Nucl. Technol. 2 (2016) 38-47 (In Persian).
[10] Soleimaninia M., Ahmadi M., Zarei S., “Calculation and simulation of the designed shield for gamma industrial irradiator in Bonab”, J. Radiat. Nucl. Technol. 2 (2015) 55-62 (In Persian).
[11] Stankovic S.J., Ilic R.D., Jankovic K., Bojovic D., Longar B., “Gamma radiation absorption characteristics of concrete with components of different type materials”, Acta Phys. Pol. A 117 (2010) 812–816.
[12] Shultis J.K., Faw R.E., “An MCNP primer”, Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, (2004).
[13] ANSI, American National Standards Institute, Inc., Safe Design and Use of Self-Contained, Dry Source Storage Irradiators (Category I). Health Physics Society, ANSI/HPS N43.7 (2007).